• Part of
    Ubiquity Network logo
    Publish with us Download book proposal form

    Read Chapter
  • No readable formats available
  • The Ambivalence of Kosovo–EU Relations in the Last Decade: The Perspective of Kosovo’s Political Elites

    Bardhok Bashota, Dren Gërguri, Leonora Bajrami

    Chapter from the book: Butnaru Troncotă, M et al. 2024. Reconfiguring EU Peripheries: Political Elites, Contestation, and Geopolitical Shifts.

     Download

    This chapter provides a theoretical and conceptual background that sheds light on EU–Kosovo relations from a core–periphery analytical perspective. Within this research purview, the study focuses on the examination of the three main areas of interaction – politics (identity), economy, and security – manifested in the framework of contractual relations within the process of Kosovo’s integration into the EU. The study highlights the ambivalent attitudes of political elites in Kosovo, who, while resisting or contesting different aspects in relation to the EU, are still actively engaged in the EU integration process. Moreover, based on empirical data from original semi-structured interviews with representatives from the aforementioned elite, this chapter explores how the EU is perceived and contested in Kosovo within evolving circumstances in profoundly changed contexts, most recently the war in Ukraine.

    Chapter Metrics:

    How to cite this chapter
    Bashota, B et al. 2024. The Ambivalence of Kosovo–EU Relations in the Last Decade: The Perspective of Kosovo’s Political Elites. In: Butnaru Troncotă, M et al (eds.), Reconfiguring EU Peripheries. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/pro-et-contra-3-9
    License

    This chapter distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution + Noncommercial 4.0 license. Copyright is retained by the author(s)

    Peer Review Information

    This book has been peer reviewed. See our Peer Review Policies for more information.

    Additional Information

    Published on June 19, 2024

    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.33134/pro-et-contra-3-9


    comments powered by Disqus